Abstract
After an initial focus on the supposedly boundaryless openness of the internet and of online communities in particular, exclusionary effects of “open” online platforms have increasingly received more sociological attention.
Thus, even in online communities marked as explicitly open, such as in the field of open source software or in the context of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, there is a lack of diversity in terms of both contributors and contributions. Using a constitutive perspective on
openness and closedness that views them not as respective endpoints of a continuum but as mutually dependent, we develop a typology of openness–closure configurations that are characteristic for “open” online communities. As a result, the focus shifts from the assumption of
generalizable openness per se toward specific openness that is accompanied by, or even dependent on, specific forms of closure.
| Translated title of the contribution | How Open Are “Open” Online Communities? Inclusion, Exclusion, and the Ambivalence of Closures |
|---|---|
| Original language | German (Austria) |
| Pages (from-to) | 257-281 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie |
| Volume | 74 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Fields of science
- 502052 Business administration
- 502054 Entrepreneurship
- 509026 Digitalisation research
- 502015 Innovation management
- 502022 Sustainable economics
- 502058 Digital transformation
JKU Focus areas
- Digital Transformation
- Sustainable Development: Responsible Technologies and Management
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver