Transforming the #Enzian classification into a four-stage system: A feasibility study by comparison with the 2021 AAGL endometriosis classification

Nikolaus Fadinger, Peter Oppelt, Philip Trautner, Imre Szilagyi, Stefan Raidl, Simon-Hermann Enzelsberger*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop a translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system and to evaluate its performance in a retrospective endometriosis cohort.

DESIGN: Feasibility study consisting of 2 parts: First, the allocation of points for the translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system. Second, the comparison between the AAGL2021 stages and the new #Enzian stages in a retrospective cohort of patients with endometriosis surgery.

SETTING: Tertiary center in Europe.

PARTICIPANTS: 222 endometriosis patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery with perioperative documentation of both classifications.

INTERVENTIONS: The basic structure of the translation model was defined according to the point values used in the AAGL2021 classification for different anatomical locations. In the absence of a direct translation option, the corresponding points for the #Enzian compartments were determined in a survey of 3 experienced endometriosis surgeons. The final 4-stage system was then tested against the AAGL2021 classification in a retrospective dataset.

RESULTS: The distribution of endometriosis stages was similar between the 2 classifications, with a comparable percentage of patients in each stage (stage 1: 43% and 44%, stage 2: 20% and 24%, stage 3: 11% and 9%, stage 4: 27% and 21% for the #Enzian and AAGL2021 classifications, respectively). However, the composition of the stages differed slightly, especially in stages 2 and 3, which was shown in a sankey diagram. Certain deep endometriotic lesions in compartment B and adenomyosis are not respected in the AAGL2021 classification.

CONCLUSION: The #Enzian classification can be easily converted to a 4-stage scoring system similar to the AAGL2021 classification. Perhaps future research could help to determine appropriate point values based on different outcome parameters (e.g., pain, infertility, surgical complexity, …).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-645
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume32
Issue number7
Early online date05 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

Fields of science

  • 302014 Endocrinology
  • 302022 Gynaecology
  • 302017 Obstetrics

Cite this