Tolebrutinib versus Teriflunomide in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

  • Jiwon Oh
  • , Douglas L Arnold
  • , Bruce A C Cree
  • , Carolina Ionete
  • , Ho Jin Kim
  • , Maria Pia Sormani
  • , Sana Syed
  • , Yixin Chen
  • , Christina R Maxwell
  • , Patrick Benoit
  • , Timothy J Turner
  • , Erik Wallstroem
  • , Heinz Wiendl
  • , Tolebrutinib Phase 3 GEMINI 1 and 2 Trial Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tolebrutinib is an oral, brain-penetrant, and bioactive Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor that modulates peripheral inflammation and persistent immune activation within the central nervous system, including disease-associated microglia and B cells. More data are needed on its efficacy and safety in treating relapsing multiple sclerosis.

METHODS: In two phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, event-driven trials (GEMINI 1 and GEMINI 2), participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive tolebrutinib (60 mg once daily) or teriflunomide (14 mg once daily), each with matching placebo. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. The key secondary end point was confirmed worsening of disability that was sustained for at least 6 months, which was assessed in a time-to-event analysis that was pooled across trials.

RESULTS: A total of 974 participants were enrolled in GEMINI 1, and 899 were enrolled in GEMINI 2. The median follow-up was 139 weeks. The annualized relapse rate in the tolebrutinib and teriflunomide groups was 0.13 and 0.12, respectively, in GEMINI 1 (rate ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.39; P = 0.67) and 0.11 and 0.11, respectively, in GEMINI 2 (rate ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.32; P = 0.98). The pooled percentage of participants with confirmed disability worsening sustained for at least 6 months was 8.3% with tolebrutinib and 11.3% with teriflunomide (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.95; no formal hypothesis testing was conducted owing to the prespecified hierarchical testing plan, and the width of the confidence interval is not adjusted for multiple testing). The percentage of participants who had adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups, although the percentage with minor bleeding was higher in the tolebrutinib group than in the teriflunomide group (petechiae occurred in 4.5% vs. 0.3%, and heavy menses in 2.6% vs. 1.0%).

CONCLUSIONS: Tolebrutinib was not superior to teriflunomide in decreasing annualized relapse rates among participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis. (Funded by Sanofi; GEMINI 1 and GEMINI 2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04410978 and NCT04410991, respectively.).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1893-1904
Number of pages12
JournalThe New England Journal of Medicine
Volume392
Issue number19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2025

Fields of science

  • 302 Clinical Medicine
  • 305 Other Human Medicine, Health Sciences
  • 303 Health Sciences
  • 304 Medical Biotechnology
  • 301 Medical-Theoretical Sciences, Pharmacy

Cite this