To build or not to build? Sustainability narratives between growth-oriented ‘eco-markets’ and regulative ‘sufficiency’ in Germany's heat transition

  • Valentin Sagvosdkin*
  • , Lukas Bäuerle
  • , Josephine Semb
  • , Barbara Praetorius
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Narratives play a significant role in shaping sustainability transitions. The amendment to the German Building Energy Act (Gebaudeenergiegesetz ¨ ) in 2023, aiming at stricter emission regulations for heating appliances, provides a striking example: its original version was weakened following a strong counter-campaign led by conservative and right-wing political actors. In media debates, misinformation and populist narratives of ‘the people’ affected by the GEG and a ‘green elite’ were used to delegitimize the amendment. However, it remains unclear if affected stakeholders share these narratives and what their visions of sustainability in heating and housing transitions entail. We employed semi-structured interviews to gain insights from 23 expert practitioners across 6 key stakeholder groups affected by the GEG. Content and narrative analysis reveal that sustainability as such is not directly questioned. Instead, two distinct narratives emerge: First, a Sustainable Markets Narrative, predominantly promoted by entrepreneurial actors, emphasising the need for new construction, innovation through markets, eco-efficiency, and market-compatible policies. Second, a Sufficiency Narrative, predominantly supported by Non-Governmental Organisations and administrative actors, that relies on policy mixes, considers rethinking ownership structures, and prioritises the conversion of existing buildings over new construction. However, this narrative is much less common and lacks positive, guiding imaginaries. To position policy proposals on a spectrum from weak to strong sufficiency, we referenced the Energy Sufficiency Policy Database. We
find consensus across stakeholders regarding weak approaches such as senior-friendly shared housing or energy consultancy. Regulatory policies like rent caps are absent, indicating a notable science-stakeholder gap regarding stronger sufficiency proposals.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104527
Pages (from-to)104527
Number of pages12
JournalEnergy Research and Social Science
Volume131
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2026

Fields of science

  • 502022 Sustainable economics
  • 506007 International relations
  • 509023 Development research
  • 502049 Economic history
  • 502018 Macroeconomics
  • 504030 Economic sociology
  • 603124 Theory of science
  • 502055 Distribution economics
  • 504027 Special sociology
  • 603123 History of science
  • 502 Economics
  • 506013 Political theory
  • 502027 Political economy
  • 508021 Media studies
  • 509019 Futurology
  • 504007 Empirical social research
  • 509017 Social studies of science
  • 508023 Media economics

JKU Focus areas

  • Sustainable Development: Responsible Technologies and Management
  • Digital Transformation

Cite this