Abstract
Agents, some with a bias, decide between undertaking a risky project and a safe alternative based on information about the project's efficiency. Only a part of that information is verifiable. Unbiased agents want to undertake only efficient projects, but biased agents want to undertake any project. If the project causes harm, a court examines the verifiable information, forms a belief about the agent's type, and decides the punishment. Tension arises between deterring inefficient projects and a chilling effect on using the unverifiable information. Improving the unverifiable information always increases overall efficiency, but improving the verifiable information may reduce efficiency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 360-384 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | The RAND Journal of Economics |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01 Jun 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fields of science
- 502053 Economics
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver