Abstract
Cyber security is a challenge for all organizations and companies, especially for those classified as critical infrastructure providers, such as hospitals and energy providers. Attempts to prevent or fight against cyberattacks are various., Therefore, critical infrastructure providers remain searching for an institutionalized solution. Security operation centers (SOCs) seem to offer an opportunity to tackle this issue, but to date, it remains unclear, what influenced the implementation of a SOC. Directly bound to cyber security and business continuity management, the strategic role of SOCs has been addressed, previously. The role that SOCs play for critical infrastructure providers still needs to be clarified. Our case study shows, that
decisions for implementing a SOC are influenced by different perspectives, i.e., strategic, socio-technical, and solution-implementation perspectives. All three perspectives share factors with existing cyber security research but also give new insights, particularly regarding the social aspects of SOC staff and the fact that businesses are in favor of an outsourced SOC to
benefit from shared resources, reduced costs and skilled staff.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Conf-IRM 2024 Proceedings |
Number of pages | 13 |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Fields of science
- 303026 Public health
- 305909 Stress research
- 102 Computer Sciences
- 102006 Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW)
- 102015 Information systems
- 102016 IT security
- 502007 E-commerce
- 502014 Innovation research
- 502030 Project management
- 509026 Digitalisation research
- 501016 Educational psychology
- 602036 Neurolinguistics
- 501030 Cognitive science
- 502032 Quality management
- 502043 Business consultancy
- 502044 Business management
- 502050 Business informatics
- 502058 Digital transformation
- 503008 E-learning
- 509004 Evaluation research
- 301407 Neurophysiology
- 301401 Brain research
JKU Focus areas
- Digital Transformation