Abstract
Using a matched insurant–general practitioner panel data set, we estimate the effect of a general health-screening program
on individuals’ health status and health-care cost. To account for selection into treatment, we use regional variation in the
intensity of exposure to supply-determined screening recommendations as an instrumental variable. We find that screening
participation increases inpatient and outpatient health-care costs up to 2 years after treatment substantially. In the medium
run, we find cost savings in the outpatient sector, whereas in the long run, no statistically significant effects of screening on
either health-care cost component can be discerned. In sum, screening participation increases health-care cost. Given that
we do not find any statistically significant effect of screening participation on insurants’ health status (at any point in time),
we do not recommend a general health-screening program. However, given that we find some evidence for cost-saving
potential for the sub-sample of younger insurants, we suggest more targeted screening programs.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 913-935 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Health Economics |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2015 |
Fields of science
- 502 Economics
JKU Focus areas
- Social Systems, Markets and Welfare States
- Social and Economic Sciences (in general)