Abstract
In this article, we tested two concepts of decision making: expected utility theory and heuristic choice. In Experiment 1, we applied think-aloud protocols to investigate violations of expected utility theory. In Experiments 2 to 4, we introduced a new process-tracing method—called predict-aloud protocols—that has advantages over previously suggested research methods. Results show the following: (i) people examine information between rather than within gambles; (ii) the priority heuristic emerges as the most frequently used strategy when problems are difficult; and (iii) people check for similarity when problems are easy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 185-197 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Behavioral Decision Making |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Fields of science
- 501006 Experimental psychology
- 501021 Social psychology
- 501015 Organisational psychology