Abstract
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations are increasingly vital for healthcare organizations (HCOs), which face rising pressures from climate change, limited financial resources, and regulatory obligations towards HCOs’ engagement for ESG-matters. Environmentally, the healthcare sector contributes around 4.4% of global CO₂ emissions, underscoring the urgency of green transformation. This study systematically reviews the academic literature to identify which types of sustainability management controls (SMCs) are used to support ESG-matters in HCOs and outlines avenues for future research. The review is global in scope and includes all types of HCOs. Drawing on strategic stakeholder and legitimacy theory, the most widely applied theories in ESG-accounting, this study explores the instrumental and socio-political dimensions of SMCs. The findings reveal a dominant emphasis on environmental sustainability, with cultural and administrative controls being the most frequently discussed, while cybernetic, planning and strategy, and reward and compensation remain under explored. The study highlights the lack of strategic-operational integration and offers a conceptual framework to guide researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in embedding ESG-driven management control systems more effectively.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 125 |
| Journal | BMC health services research |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 23 Dec 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2026 |
Fields of science
- 502052 Business administration
- 502031 Public management
- 502023 NPO research
- 502022 Sustainable economics
- 502 Economics
- 502044 Business management
- 502048 Business ethics
- 502006 Controlling
- 502033 Accounting
- 502024 Public economy
JKU Focus areas
- Sustainable Development: Responsible Technologies and Management