Strategic environmental taxation in the presence of involuntary unemployment and endogeneous location choice

Michael Pfaffermayr, Susanne Pech

Research output: Working paper and reportsWorking paper

Abstract

We analyze strategic environmental taxation in a two-country model with local environmental pollution. Two firms decide whether to serve the foreign market either by exports from the domestic plant or by operating a subsidiary in the foreign country. When involuntary unemployment prevails, a conflict in two policy goals arises: One the one hand countries want to internalize the negative externalities due to pollution in production. On the other hand they try to fight unemployment by inducing the foreign firm to immigrate by means of low environmental taxes. We identify two non cooperative equilibria depending on the magnitude of the marginal disutility of pollution and of the firms' mobility: Either countries are content with one plant within their bounderies or, alternatively, interjurisdictional competition results in two plants in each country. Whether the latter equilibrium induces welfare losses for both countries, depends again on the parameter values. This result is in contrast to previous studies, which neglected labour market effects.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1998

Publication series

NameWorking Papers of the Department of Economics at JKU Linz
No.9824

Fields of science

  • 405002 Agricultural economics
  • 502 Economics
  • 502001 Labour market policy
  • 502002 Labour economics
  • 502003 Foreign trade
  • 502009 Corporate finance
  • 502010 Public finance
  • 502012 Industrial management
  • 502013 Industrial economics
  • 502018 Macroeconomics
  • 502020 Market research
  • 502021 Microeconomics
  • 502025 Econometrics
  • 502027 Political economy
  • 502039 Structural policy
  • 502042 Environmental economics
  • 502046 Economic policy
  • 502047 Economic theory
  • 504014 Gender studies
  • 506004 European integration
  • 507016 Regional economy
  • 303010 Health economics

Cite this