Safety of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: First European results from the cryo AF Global Registry

  • Csaba Földesi
  • , Silvia Misiková
  • , Paweł Ptaszyński
  • , Derick Todd
  • , Jean-Manuel Herzet
  • , Kendra M Braegelmann
  • , Fred J Kueffer
  • , Christian Drephal
  • , Clemens Steinwender
  • , Giulio Zucchelli
  • , Petr Neuzil
  • , Kyoung Ryul Julian Chun*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been utilized in Europe for >15 years.

OBJECTIVES: Report patient and procedural characteristics that influence the safety of cryoablation for the treatment of AF.

METHODS: Patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter Cryo AF Global Registry were treated at 38 European centers. Freedom from a ≥30s episode of AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) at 12-months and serious complications were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable models identified baseline patient and procedural characteristics that predicted a procedure-related complication.

RESULTS: Of the 1418 subjects who completed an index procedure, the cohort was 62 ± 11 years of age, 37.7% female, and 72.2% paroxysmal AF (PAF). The mean procedure, left atrial dwell, and fluoroscopy times were 81 ± 34, 54 ± 25, and 14 ± 13 min, respectively. Among the 766 patients with 12-month follow-up, freedom from a ≥30 s AF/AFL/AT recurrence was 83.3% (95% CI: 79.8%-86.3%) and 71.6% (95% CI: 64.6%-77.4%) in patients with PAF and persistent AF. The serious procedure- and device-related adverse event rates were 4.7% and 2.0%. No baseline patient characteristic independently predicted a procedure-related adverse event; however, prolonged procedure duration (OR = 1.01 [95% CI: 1.00-1.01]), use of general anesthesia (OR = 1.71 [95% CI: 1.01-2.92]), and delivery of a cavotricuspid isthmus line (OR = 3.04 [95% CI: 1.01-9.20]) were each independently associated with the occurrence of a serious procedural safety event (all p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Cryoballoon ablation is safe and effective in real-world use across a broad cohort of patients with AF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)883-894
Number of pages12
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Fields of science

  • 302 Clinical Medicine
  • 302031 Intensive care medicine
  • 302032 Cardiology
  • 302030 Internal medicine

Cite this