Abstract
Particularly in governance and policy processes, critique is embedded in highly institutionalized formats. In this chapter, the authors apply Boltanski’s concept of critical tests to examine accepted forms of expression in the context of an institutionalized policy setting, the annual Conferences of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The authors find that different policy actors’ uses of critique reflect embedded field positions and interests. While marginal actors drew upon existential tests to construct radical critique, the highly ritualized performance of critique called into question its efficacy in promoting change within the overall structure of a highly institutionalized event. The authors discuss inroads to studying the relations between critique, power, and microfoundations of institutions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Microfoundations of Institutions. Vol. 65B |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited |
| Pages | 23-40 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-78769-128-5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2019 |
Publication series
| Name | Research in the Sociology of Organizations |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 0733-558X |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fields of science
- 502 Economics
- 502014 Innovation research
- 502026 Human resource management
- 502030 Project management
- 502015 Innovation management
- 502029 Product management
- 502036 Risk management
- 502043 Business consultancy
- 502044 Business management
- 506009 Organisation theory
JKU Focus areas
- Digital Transformation
- Sustainable Development: Responsible Technologies and Management
- Transformation in Finance and Financial Institutions
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver