Abstract
The involuntary loss of employment has been shown to deteriorate subjective well-being. Adopting a cross-cultural perspective on Jahoda's (1982) deprivation model this study examines several latent and manifest benefits of work that were expected to mediate the effects of employment status on well-being. It was hypothesized that in more collectivistic societies the decline in subjective well-being would be a consequence of a diminished sense of collective purpose for the non-employed, whereas in individualistic societies the crucial factors would be a loss of social status and financial benefits. The findings from two representative national surveys conducted in the United States (N = 1,093) and Japan (N = 647) provided partial support for these hypotheses. Cultural differences moderated the effects of employment status on the benefits of work. As a consequence, different processes mediated the decline in well-being for the non-employed in the two countries. These results are embedded within the wider discourse on culture and its effect on unemployment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 659–669 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Scandinavian Journal of Psychology |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2015 |
Fields of science
- 501012 Media psychology
- 501 Psychology
- 501003 Occupational psychology
- 501015 Organisational psychology
JKU Focus areas
- Management and Innovation
- Social Systems, Markets and Welfare States
- Social and Economic Sciences (in general)