Abstract
The discussion if learning should better be self-directed or not is approximately as old as didactic thinking. Supported by the influence of a general raise of constructivism within the last decades, peadagogic thinking tended more and more to focus on self-organized and self-directed learning. Taking note of the problems of didactical concepts which refer to constructivism, this paper especially discusses the problematic misinterpretation of self-organized learning as a kind of self-directed learning and suggests complexity-theory as a promising background of didactical thinking. The author first gives an outline of a didactical philosophy which is systematically aware of the fundamental relevance of external initial influences to self-organized learning and subsequently tries to mark some areas of necessary professional teaching-competencies which result from linking didactics to complexity-theory in order to support the individual development of expertise.
| Translated title of the contribution | The professional didactics between the external control and self-directing of learning. About the necessary competences of didactician oriented towards the complexity-theory |
|---|---|
| Original language | Croatian |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Pedagogijska Istraživanja |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Fields of science
- 501003 Occupational psychology
- 501011 Cognitive psychology
- 501016 Educational psychology
- 502052 Business administration
- 503 Educational Sciences
- 503001 General education
- 503002 Applied education
- 503005 Vocational education
- 503006 Educational research
- 503007 Didactics
- 503014 Subject didactics of social sciences
- 503025 School pedagogy
- 503030 Business education
- 603102 Epistemology
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver