Abstract
The residual value of heavy equipment is essential for financial and economic considerations in the construction industry. In practice, empirical methods are frequently used to determine the residual value of a given piece of equipment. Here, various regression methods are compared based on a real-world dataset of used heavy equipment sales from a construction company. The results show that the prediction performance of traditional methods is clearly worse when compared to machine learning models not yet employed for this purpose. For the latter, preprocessing and parameter tuning are essential, and the article guides through these steps. Further, the article demonstrates how a variable importance value comparable across all methods
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 109599 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence |
| Volume | 141 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01 Feb 2025 |
Fields of science
- 102006 Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW)
- 102015 Information systems
- 102016 IT security
- 102020 Medical informatics
- 102022 Software development
- 102027 Web engineering
- 102034 Cyber-physical systems
- 509026 Digitalisation research
- 102040 Quantum computing
- 502032 Quality management
- 502050 Business informatics
- 503015 Subject didactics of technical sciences
JKU Focus areas
- Digital Transformation