Not all oil types are alike in trade substitution

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Motivated by the ongoing war in Ukraine and the public debate on sanctioning crude oil imports from Russia, we estimate the elasticity of substitution between different crude oil types. Using European data on country-level crude oil imports by their field of origin, we argue that crude oil is far from a homogenous good, and that the relevant substitutability for analyzing the impact of trade sanctions must account for the quality of different oil types in terms of their density and sulfur content. Distinguishing crude oil imports by their chemical composition, the elasticity of substitution between types is substantially lower than suggested by previous estimates. Our results also suggest that, by neglecting these differences in quality, standard estimates underestimate the production disruptions and price effects in crude oil refining resulting from sanctions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number7476
Number of pages12
JournalNature Communications
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024

Fields of science

  • 303010 Health economics
  • 502 Economics
  • 502002 Labour economics
  • 502009 Corporate finance
  • 502021 Microeconomics
  • 502042 Environmental economics
  • 502047 Economic theory
  • 504014 Gender studies
  • 507016 Regional economy
  • 405002 Agricultural economics
  • 502001 Labour market policy
  • 502003 Foreign trade
  • 502010 Public finance
  • 502012 Industrial management
  • 502013 Industrial economics
  • 502018 Macroeconomics
  • 502020 Market research
  • 502025 Econometrics
  • 502027 Political economy
  • 502039 Structural policy
  • 502046 Economic policy
  • 506004 European integration

JKU Focus areas

  • Sustainable Development: Responsible Technologies and Management

Cite this