Abstract
Epilepsy has been one of the most prevalent neurological disorders, affecting over 50 million people worldwide. Reliable and timely seizure detection has been crucial for improving patients' quality of life and guiding appropriate treatments. While deep learning has shown significant promise in this domain, its effectiveness has depended on large, well-labeled, and centralized datasets. However, medical data has often been scarce and distributed across multiple institutions, with privacy regulations making data sharing infeasible. To address these challenges, we have explored both centralized and federated few-shot learning (FSL) for multiclass epileptic seizure detection, enabling effective model training under data constraints while preserving patient privacy.
We have evaluated three classifier architectures—a similarity-based classifier, a fully connected neural network (FCNN), and a transformer—under both centralized and federated settings. Additionally, we have analyzed how varying the number of support set samples influences model performance. Our results have shown that the FCNN consistently achieved the highest performance across different sample sizes in both settings. However, transformers occasionally demonstrated stronger discriminative capabilities between seizure types. Interestingly, we discovered that increasing the support set size did not always lead to performance improvements, highlighting the complexities of few-shot learning in seizure detection.
In the federated setting, we have successfully implemented a privacy-preserving FSL approach and identified key challenges, such as the impact of class imbalance across institutions on model generalization. Our findings have revealed that standard federated learning algorithms were not well-suited for scenarios with limited data. Despite these limitations, centralized FSL has achieved strong performance, while federated FSL has remained a promising solution for EEG-based seizure detection in privacy-sensitive environments.
This study has introduced a novel approach to centralized FSL and laid a foundation for federated FSL. Our results have demonstrated meaningful progress in privacy-preserving seizure detection with limited data, paving the way for future advancements in both centralized and federated FSL for epileptic seizure classification.
We have evaluated three classifier architectures—a similarity-based classifier, a fully connected neural network (FCNN), and a transformer—under both centralized and federated settings. Additionally, we have analyzed how varying the number of support set samples influences model performance. Our results have shown that the FCNN consistently achieved the highest performance across different sample sizes in both settings. However, transformers occasionally demonstrated stronger discriminative capabilities between seizure types. Interestingly, we discovered that increasing the support set size did not always lead to performance improvements, highlighting the complexities of few-shot learning in seizure detection.
In the federated setting, we have successfully implemented a privacy-preserving FSL approach and identified key challenges, such as the impact of class imbalance across institutions on model generalization. Our findings have revealed that standard federated learning algorithms were not well-suited for scenarios with limited data. Despite these limitations, centralized FSL has achieved strong performance, while federated FSL has remained a promising solution for EEG-based seizure detection in privacy-sensitive environments.
This study has introduced a novel approach to centralized FSL and laid a foundation for federated FSL. Our results have demonstrated meaningful progress in privacy-preserving seizure detection with limited data, paving the way for future advancements in both centralized and federated FSL for epileptic seizure classification.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Qualification | Master |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisors/Reviewers |
|
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2025 |
Fields of science
- 102019 Machine learning
- 102018 Artificial neural networks
- 102033 Data mining
- 102032 Computational intelligence
- 305901 Computer-aided diagnosis and therapy
- 101016 Optimisation
- 101031 Approximation theory
- 106007 Biostatistics
- 202036 Sensor systems
- 101019 Stochastics
- 102003 Image processing
- 103029 Statistical physics
- 101018 Statistics
- 101017 Game theory
- 102001 Artificial intelligence
- 202017 Embedded systems
- 101015 Operations research
- 101014 Numerical mathematics
- 101029 Mathematical statistics
- 101028 Mathematical modelling
- 101026 Time series analysis
- 101024 Probability theory
- 102004 Bioinformatics
- 102013 Human-computer interaction
- 101027 Dynamical systems
- 305907 Medical statistics
- 101004 Biomathematics
- 305905 Medical informatics
- 102 Computer Sciences
- 106005 Bioinformatics
- 202037 Signal processing
- 202035 Robotics
JKU Focus areas
- Digital Transformation