Making the results of bottom-up energy savings comparable

Simon Moser, Klemens Leutgöb, Johannes Reichl, Andrea Kollmann

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The Energy Service Directive (ESD) has pushed forward the issue of energy savings calculations without clarifying the methodological basis. Savings achieved in the Member States are calculated with rather non-transparent and hardly comparable Bottom-up (BU) methods. We develop the idea of parallel evaluation tracks separating the Member States’ issue of ESD verification and comparable savings calculations. The idea is analogous to the calculation of unemployment rates, where a common European calculation routine exists which is independent from national methodologies. Comparability is ensured by developing a standardised BU calculation kernel for different energy efficiency improvement (EEI) actions which simultaneously depicts the different calculation options in a structured way (e.g. baseline definition, system boundaries, double counting). Due to the heterogeneity of BU calculations the approach requires a central database where Member States feed in input data on BU actions according to a predefined structure (e.g. XML standard). The paper demonstrates the proposed approach including a concrete example of application.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)687-702
    Number of pages16
    JournalThermal Science
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fields of science

    • 211 Other Technical Sciences

    JKU Focus areas

    • Management and Innovation
    • Social and Economic Sciences (in general)

    Cite this