Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interim analysis of a post-authorization safety study of pitolisant in treating narcolepsy: A real-world European study

  • Giuseppe Plazzi*
  • , Geert Mayer
  • , Ralf Bodenschatz
  • , Enrica Bonanni
  • , Alessandro Cicolin
  • , Giacomo Della Marca
  • , Pierluigi Dolso
  • , Luigi Ferini Strambi
  • , Raffaele Ferri
  • , Peter Geisler
  • , Svenja Happe
  • , Anna Heidbreder
  • , Jürgen Herold
  • , Ulf Kallweit
  • , Laurène Leclair-Visonneau
  • , Katharina Lederer
  • , Claudio Liguori
  • , Johan Meurling
  • , Liborio Parrino
  • , Paola Proserpio
  • Monica Puligheddu, Maria Antonia Quera Salva, Jan Remi, Andrea Romigi, Sven Rupprecht, Maria Antonietta Savarese, Jean-Luc Schaff, Michele Terzaghi, Yaroslav Winter, Christian Caussé, Irène Collin, Isabelle Lecomte, Yves Dauvilliers
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Narcolepsy is a chronic sleep disorder characterized mainly by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy in the case of narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). Pitolisant is a histamine 3 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist that reduces EDS and cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy.

METHODS: We performed a prospective 5-year follow-up, non-interventional study of adults with NT1 and NT2 receiving pitolisant. The primary objectives were to collect information on the long-term safety of pitolisant and analyze the utilization patterns of pitolisant. The secondary objectives were to assess clinical benefit, adherence, impact on patients' quality of life, disease burden, and patient satisfaction. We reported the results of an interim analysis after 42.6 months.

RESULTS: The population comprised 370 patients (mean age, 40 ± 15 years; 51.4 % women; NT1, 71.4 %; NT2, 28.6 %); 364 received ≥1 dose of pitolisant. Data were available for 356 patients (97.8 %). Most patients (68.4 %) had ≥1 comorbidity (obesity [BMI≥30], 31.9 %; neuropsychiatric, 31 %; and cardiovascular, 22.8 %). Forty-eight patients (13.2 %) had received no prior narcoleptic treatment, while 98 (31 %) were taking a previous therapy, which was switched to pitolisant. Treatment was combined with pitolisant in 218 (69 %) patients. Pitolisant was discontinued by 131 patients (35.4 %), mainly for safety reasons (14.3 %), lack of response (8.7 %), and patient decision (7.6 %). Overall, 355 treatment-emergent adverse events (3 serious) were reported by 156 patients (42.9 % of safety population), with 218 possibly treatment-related (61.4 %) in 109 patients (29.9 %). Improvements were observed in EDS, cataplexy, and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS: Pitolisant was generally safe and well tolerated in patients with NT1 and NT2 and can be used in both types. Improvements were found in EDS, cataplexy, and quality of life, with good adherence and satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-30
Number of pages11
JournalSleep Medicine
Volume129
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fields of science

  • 302052 Neurology

Cite this