Abstract
Most interesting proofs in mathematics contain an inductive argument which requires an extension of the \textbf{LK}-calculus to formalize. The most commonly used calculi contain a separate rule or axiom which reduces the important proof theoretic properties of the calculus. In such cases cut-elimination does not result in analytic proofs, i.e.\ every formula occurring in the proof is a subformula of the end sequent. Proof schemata are a generalization of \textbf{LK}-proofs able to simulate induction by linking proofs, indexed by a natural number, together. Using a global cut-elimination method a normal form can be reached which allows a schema of {\em Herbrand Sequents} to be produced, an essential step for proof analysis in the presence of induction. However, proof schema have only been studied in a limited context and are currently defined for a very particular proof structure based on a slight extension of the \textbf{LK}-calculus. The result is an opaque and complex formalization. In this paper, we introduce a calculus integrating the proof schema formalization and in the process we elucidate properties of proof schemata which can be used to extend the formalism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | TABLEAUX 2017 |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |
Fields of science
- 101 Mathematics
- 101001 Algebra
- 101005 Computer algebra
- 101009 Geometry
- 101012 Combinatorics
- 101013 Mathematical logic
- 101020 Technical mathematics
JKU Focus areas
- Computation in Informatics and Mathematics
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver