Abstract
We examine the relation between low-skilled and high-skilled immigration and public spending from a theoretical and an empirical perspective. We introduce the distinction of public spending on private goods and on public goods. Our model implies that high-skilled immigration can have a negative effect on public spending only in the presence of an antisocial effect. We test our theoretical hypotheses, the 'income effect' and the 'anti-social effect' of immigration and a 'welfare magnet effect' of public spending empirically using OECD panel data for 1990-2001. Estimating a system of simultaneous equations using three stage least squares (3SLS), we find evidence for an anti-social effect for low-skilled and highskilled immigrants. In addition, we also find empirical evidence for the welfare magnet effect.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - Nov 2005 |
Fields of science
- 405002 Agricultural economics
- 502 Economics
- 502001 Labour market policy
- 502002 Labour economics
- 502003 Foreign trade
- 502009 Corporate finance
- 502010 Public finance
- 502012 Industrial management
- 502013 Industrial economics
- 502018 Macroeconomics
- 502020 Market research
- 502021 Microeconomics
- 502025 Econometrics
- 502027 Political economy
- 502039 Structural policy
- 502042 Environmental economics
- 502046 Economic policy
- 502047 Economic theory
- 504014 Gender studies
- 506004 European integration
- 507016 Regional economy
- 303010 Health economics