Abstract
In the first part of this study we analyze equilibria and social optima in an externality
game with (purely) altruistic agents. Altruistic equilibria will be less socially
inefficient than selfish equilibria, yet, less efficient than the social optimum.
In the second part altruism is compared to other formalizations of the concern
for others, which are often considered to belong to the altruism literature. We will
show that these approaches can be formally very different and even hardly compatible.
To highlight some of these formal differences, we apply a formalization of inequality
aversion and a formalization of reciprocity to the externality game of Part I. Where
possible, we pursue this exercise up to finding the reaction functions of the game.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Fields of science
- 405002 Agricultural economics
- 502 Economics
- 502001 Labour market policy
- 502002 Labour economics
- 502003 Foreign trade
- 502009 Corporate finance
- 502010 Public finance
- 502012 Industrial management
- 502013 Industrial economics
- 502018 Macroeconomics
- 502020 Market research
- 502021 Microeconomics
- 502025 Econometrics
- 502027 Political economy
- 502039 Structural policy
- 502042 Environmental economics
- 502046 Economic policy
- 502047 Economic theory
- 504014 Gender studies
- 506004 European integration
- 507016 Regional economy
- 303010 Health economics
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver