TY - GEN
T1 - Evaluation of Cybersecurity Management Controls and Metrics of Critical Infrastructures: A Literature Review Considering the NIST Cybersecurity Framework
AU - Krumay, Barbara
AU - Bernroider, Edward W.N.
AU - Walser, Roman
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - In recent years, cybersecurity management has gained considerable attention due to a rising number and also increasing severity of cyberattacks in particular targeted at critical infrastructures of countries. Especially rapid digitization holds many vulnerabilities that can be easily exploited if not managed appropriately. Consequently, the European Union (EU) has enacted its first directive on cybersecurity. It is based on the Cybersecurity Framework by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and requires critical infrastructure organizations to regularly monitor and report their cybersecurity efforts. We investigated whether the academic body of knowledge in the area of cybersecurity metrics and controls has covered the constituent NIST functions, and also whether NIST shows any noticeable gaps in relation to literature. Our analysis revealed interesting results in both directions, pointing to imbalances in the academic discourse and underrepresented areas in the NIST framework. In terms of the former, we argue that future research should engage more into detecting, responding and recovering from incidents. Regarding the latter, NIST could also benefit from extending into a number of identified topic areas, for example, natural disasters, monetary aspects, and organizational climate.
AB - In recent years, cybersecurity management has gained considerable attention due to a rising number and also increasing severity of cyberattacks in particular targeted at critical infrastructures of countries. Especially rapid digitization holds many vulnerabilities that can be easily exploited if not managed appropriately. Consequently, the European Union (EU) has enacted its first directive on cybersecurity. It is based on the Cybersecurity Framework by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and requires critical infrastructure organizations to regularly monitor and report their cybersecurity efforts. We investigated whether the academic body of knowledge in the area of cybersecurity metrics and controls has covered the constituent NIST functions, and also whether NIST shows any noticeable gaps in relation to literature. Our analysis revealed interesting results in both directions, pointing to imbalances in the academic discourse and underrepresented areas in the NIST framework. In terms of the former, we argue that future research should engage more into detecting, responding and recovering from incidents. Regarding the latter, NIST could also benefit from extending into a number of identified topic areas, for example, natural disasters, monetary aspects, and organizational climate.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85057400053
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-03638-6_23
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-03638-6_23
M3 - Conference proceedings
SN - 978-3-030-03638-6
VL - 11252
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)
SP - 369
EP - 384
BT - Secure IT Systems. 23rd Nordic Conference, NordSec 2018, Oslo, Norway, November 28-30, 2018, Proceedings
A2 - Gruschka N., null
PB - Springer, Cham
ER -