TY - JOUR
T1 - EPM2 AIP1 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate of promoter methylation analysis in endometrial carcinoma
AU - Gatius, Sonia
AU - Vaquero, Marta
AU - Scheiber, Oliver
AU - Velasco, Ana
AU - Cuevas, Dolors
AU - Kashofer, Karl
AU - Santacana, Maria
AU - Eritja, Núria
AU - Lax, Sigurd
AU - Matias-Guiu, Xavier
N1 - © 2025. The Author(s).
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Mismatch repair (MMR) status in endometrial carcinoma (EC) is crucial for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and Lynch syndrome pre-screening. MLH1 loss is the most frequent cause of MMR deficiency and usually by promoter hypermethylation. We tried to confirm the role of EPM2 AIP1 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate of MLH1 promoter methylation in EC. Case series from two different institutions were analyzed by comparable methods using immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins and EPM2 AIP1, and pyrosequencing for MLH1 methylation. In the first series of 70 cases, concordance was 100%, after reassessing three cases with methylation scores close to cut-off, by tumor cell enrichment. In the second series of 29 MLH1-deficient ECs, concordance was 96.5%, while in the control group of 30 MMR-proficient EC, one MLH1-positive case was EPM2 AIP1-negative. EPM2 AIP1 immunoreactivity was qualitatively superior in curettages and biopsies compared to hysterectomy. We conclude that EPM2 AIP1 immunohistochemistry is a good surrogate for MLH1 promoter methylation analysis, cost-effective with short turnaround time, but needs attention regarding preanalytical handling, normal tissue contamination, or low tumor percentage.
AB - Mismatch repair (MMR) status in endometrial carcinoma (EC) is crucial for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and Lynch syndrome pre-screening. MLH1 loss is the most frequent cause of MMR deficiency and usually by promoter hypermethylation. We tried to confirm the role of EPM2 AIP1 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate of MLH1 promoter methylation in EC. Case series from two different institutions were analyzed by comparable methods using immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins and EPM2 AIP1, and pyrosequencing for MLH1 methylation. In the first series of 70 cases, concordance was 100%, after reassessing three cases with methylation scores close to cut-off, by tumor cell enrichment. In the second series of 29 MLH1-deficient ECs, concordance was 96.5%, while in the control group of 30 MMR-proficient EC, one MLH1-positive case was EPM2 AIP1-negative. EPM2 AIP1 immunoreactivity was qualitatively superior in curettages and biopsies compared to hysterectomy. We conclude that EPM2 AIP1 immunohistochemistry is a good surrogate for MLH1 promoter methylation analysis, cost-effective with short turnaround time, but needs attention regarding preanalytical handling, normal tissue contamination, or low tumor percentage.
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics
KW - DNA Methylation
KW - Promoter Regions, Genetic
KW - Immunohistochemistry/methods
KW - Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis
KW - Middle Aged
KW - MutL Protein Homolog 1/genetics
KW - Aged
KW - Adult
KW - Carrier Proteins/analysis
KW - DNA Mismatch Repair
KW - Aged, 80 and over
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007244163
U2 - 10.1007/s00428-025-04132-3
DO - 10.1007/s00428-025-04132-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 40468018
SN - 1432-2307
VL - 487
SP - 511
EP - 522
JO - Virchows Archiv
JF - Virchows Archiv
IS - 3
ER -