Abstract
The European mandatory bid rule (‘MBR’) was a key factor in the controversy surrounding the legislative proceedings concerning the Takeover Directive (‘TOD’). The MBR has had an eventful history, characterised by political compromises, the active influencing of legislative procedures (regulatory capture) and ongoing controversies about the economic rationale of the MBR. This chapter traces the history of the MBR and its development. Additionally, it highlights the crucial issues that led to the enactment of the MBR and ultimately the adoption of the TOD. The core thesis is that the changing mood in the Member States was primarily responsible for the shift in opinion that created the potential for the introduction of the MBR at a European Union Level in the first place. However, the influence of the MBR on the capital markets of the Member States has been limited. The TOD has failed to achieve its regulatory objective at any rate. The assessment may only be different for smaller Member States without a long tradition of takeover law and/or strong capital markets. In these countries, for example Poland, the MBR might have had a greater influence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Unfinished Business |
| Subtitle of host publication | Two Decades with the EU Takeover Directive |
| Editors | Susan Emmenegger, Martin Winner, Andreas Recalde Castells, Rolf Skog |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 143-162 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781009654425 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781009654432 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 05 Mar 2026 |
Fields of science
- 505013 Private law
- 505034 Banking and capital market law
- 505031 Civil law
- 505 Law
- 505030 Commercial law
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver