Abstract
In this memo, two teleconferencing systems, Zoom and BigBlueButton, are compared with respect
to their accessibility/usability with a screen reader software for blind users. Here is the list of
products, with the precise version numbers, which are covered in the report. It is understood as
work in progress, meaning that, over time, I plan to include more screen readers and web browsers,
perhaps even more teleconferencing systems, in the comparison
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Future Perspectives of AT, eAccessibility and eInclusion |
| Editors | ICCHP |
| Pages | 51-54 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2020 |
Publication series
| Name | ICCHP open access compendium |
|---|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education -
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fields of science
- 102 Computer Sciences
- 102013 Human-computer interaction
- 102014 Information design
- 102015 Information systems
- 102021 Pervasive computing
- 102022 Software development
- 102024 Usability research
- 102026 Virtual reality
- 102027 Web engineering
- 102036 Digital accessibility
- 502007 E-commerce
- 506002 E-government
- 509002 Disability studies
- 602013 Sign language research
- 202004 Brain-computer interface
- 211902 Assistive technologies
- 503008 E-learning
- 302027 Hearing, voice and language disorders
JKU Focus areas
- Digital Transformation
- Sustainable Development: Responsible Technologies and Management
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver