Abstract
Closed vs. open access: scientometric gender
analysis of three social science journals.
The paper is part of a larger investigation which analyses the potentials
of open access publishing in order to increase the publication and therefore
career opportunities for female social scientists. It compares three thematically and ethodologically similar social sciences journals: the open-access journal "Forum Qualitative
Social Research" (FQS) and
the two Closed-Access-/ Hybrid journals "Zeitschrift für qualitative Forschung"
(ZQF) and "Sozialer Sinn"
(SoSi). The data was collected on the percentage of female editorial and
advisory board members of these three journals (N = 184 total). An extensive
reconstruction and analysis
was carried out to mark the gender structure of the authorship of the three journals 2000-2008 published
articles (N = 1557 total).
| Translated title of the contribution | Closed vs. open access: Scientometric gender analysis of three social science journals |
|---|---|
| Original language | German (Austria) |
| Pages (from-to) | 173-176 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - May 2011 |
Fields of science
- 603 Philosophy, Ethics, Religion
- 504 Sociology
- 509017 Social studies of science
- 603113 Philosophy
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver