Classifier-Based Analysis of Visual Inspection: Gender Differences in Decision-Making

Wolfgang Heidl, Stefan Thumfart, Edwin Lughofer, Christian Eitzinger, Erich Klement

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceedingspeer-review

Abstract

Among manufacturing companies there is a widespread consensus that women are better suited to perform visual quality inspection, having higher endurance and making decisions with better reproducibility. Up to now gender-differences in visual inspection decision making have not been thoroughly investigated. We propose a machine learning approach to model male and female decisions with classifiers and base the analysis of genderdifferences on the identified model parameters. A study with 50 male and 50 female subjects on a visual inspection task of stylized die-cast parts revealed significant gender-differences in the miss rate (p = 0.002), while differences in overall accuracy are not significant (p = 0.34). On a more detailed level, the application of classifier models shows gender differences are most prominent in the judgment of scratch lengths (p = 0.005). Our results suggest, that gender-differences in visual inspection are significant and that classifier-based modeling is a promising approach for analysis of these tasks.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC 2010
Editors IEEE
PublisherIEEE Press
Pages113-120
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

Fields of science

  • 101013 Mathematical logic
  • 101029 Mathematical statistics
  • 102001 Artificial intelligence
  • 102003 Image processing
  • 202027 Mechatronics

Cite this