Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Best practice approaches to social prescribing in European Primary Care: A Delphi protocol focused on link workers

  • Ferdinando Petrazzuoli*
  • , Josep Vidal-Alaball
  • , Joyce Kenkre
  • , Thomas Kloppe
  • , Sinah Evers
  • , Hendrik Napierala
  • , Jean-Pierre Jacquet
  • , Wolfram J Herrmann
  • , Natasa Mrduljaš-Đujić
  • , Andrea Neculau
  • , Katerina Javorska
  • , David Halata
  • , Miriam Dolan
  • , Joanne Robins
  • , Patrick Ouvrard
  • , Juan Manuel Mendive
  • , Carmen López Fando
  • , Jane Randall-Smith
  • , Erwin Rebhandl
  • , Sara Paternoster
  • Hans Thulesius, Sian Brand, Gindrovel Dumitra, Donata Kurpas
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Social prescribing (SP) is an innovative model that connects individuals to non-clinical community resources. However, its uptake and evaluation have been hindered by inconsistent role definitions for key stakeholders. Although recent studies have refined SP definitions, outside the UK, the responsibilities, educational backgrounds and training requirements of social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) remain poorly defined. Additionally, it is essential to identify which patient populations will benefit most from SP, establish specific methodologies, and standardize assessment tools and referral pathways.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We will employ a 3-round Delphi protocol with an international expert panel to establish consensus on SP definitions. Approximately 60 participants from diverse disciplines and regions will be recruited to complete multiple survey rounds, providing insights into the roles of SPLWs, beneficiary populations, methodologies, and assessment tools. Consensus will be defined as at least 80% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Data collection and analysis will follow rigorous protocols to ensure validity, reliability and transparency, in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research is to unify the fragmented understanding of SP and the role of SPLWs, thereby establishing a foundation for integrating SPLWs into healthcare systems where appropriate. The Delphi technique offers key strengths - namely, participant anonymity and structured iterative feedback - to enable robust consensus building. While we acknowledge limitations such as potential participant attrition and the resource-intensive nature of the methodology, these will be mitigated through targeted engagement strategies and strict adherence to established best practices.

CONCLUSION: This study addresses critical gaps in SP engagement, conceptual understanding and implementation. The anticipated outcomes will reinforce SP's role in community-based, integrated care to reduce health inequalities and foster social cohesion across Europe and beyond. Ultimately, this work aims to enhance the uptake and adoption of SP in primary care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1589-1595
Number of pages7
JournalAdvances in clinical and experimental medicine
Volume34
Issue number9
Early online date01 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Fields of science

  • 305 Other Human Medicine, Health Sciences
  • 302090 General practice
  • 503012 Subject didactics of human medicine and health sciences
  • 305903 History of medicine
  • 303026 Public health
  • 302058 Palliative medicine
  • 303025 Preventive medicine

Cite this