Abstract
High-quality performance of medical devices for glucose monitoring is important for a safe and efficient usage of this diagnostic
option by patients with diabetes. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) parameter is used most often to characterize
the measurement performance of systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Calculation of this parameter is
relatively easy and comparison of the MARD numbers between different CGM systems appears to be straightforward on the
first glance. However, a closer look reveals that a number of complex aspects make interpretation of the MARD numbers
provided by the manufacturer for their CGM systems difficult. In this review, these aspects are discussed and considerations
are made for a systematic and appropriate evaluation of the MARD in clinical trials. The MARD should not be used as the
sole parameter to characterize CGM systems, especially when it comes to nonadjunctive usage of such systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 135-150 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fields of science
- 206002 Electro-medical engineering
- 207109 Pollutant emission
- 202 Electrical Engineering, Electronics, Information Engineering
- 202027 Mechatronics
- 202034 Control engineering
- 203027 Internal combustion engines
- 206001 Biomedical engineering
JKU Focus areas
- Digital Transformation
- Sustainable Development: Responsible Technologies and Management
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver