A Neuronal Network-Based Score Predicting Survival in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Intervention: The ABC-AS Score

  • Fabian Barbieri*
  • , Bernhard Erich Pfeifer
  • , Thomas Senoner
  • , Stephan Dobner
  • , Philipp Spitaler
  • , Severin Semsroth
  • , Thomas Lambert
  • , David Zweiker
  • , Sabrina Neururer
  • , Daniel Scherr
  • , Albrecht Schmidt
  • , Gudrun Maria Feuchtner
  • , Uta C. Hoppe
  • , Agne Adukauskaite
  • , Markus Reinthaler
  • , Ulf Landmesser
  • , Silvana Müller
  • , Clemens Steinwender
  • , Wolfgang Dichtl
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite being the most commonly performed valvular intervention, risk prediction for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis by currently used risk scores remains challenging. The study aim was to develop a biomarker-based risk score by means of a neuronal network. Methods: In this multicenter study, 3595 patients were divided into test and validation cohorts (70% to 30%) by random allocation. Input variables to develop the ABC-AS score were age, the cardiac biomarker high-sensitivity troponin T, and a patient history of cardiac decompensation. The validation cohort was used to verify the scores' value and for comparison with the Society of Thoracic Surgery Predictive Risk of Operative Mortality score. Results: Receiver operating curves demonstrated an improvement in prediction by using the ABC-AS score compared to the Society of Thoracic Surgery Predictive Risk of Operative Mortality (STS prom) score. Although the difference in predicting cardiovascular mortality was most notable at 30-day follow-up (area under the curve of 0.922 versus 0.678), ABC-AS also performed better in overall follow-up (0.839 versus 0.699). Furthermore, univariate analysis of ABC-AS tertiles yielded highly significant differences for all-cause (p < 0.0001) and cardiovascular mortality (p < 0.0001). Head-to-head comparison between both risk scores in a multivariable cox regression model underlined the potential of the ABC-AS score (HR per z-unit 2.633 (95% CI 2.156-3.216), p < 0.0001), while the STS prom score failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.226). Conclusions: The newly developed ABC-AS score is an improved risk stratification tool to predict cardiovascular outcomes for patients undergoing aortic valve intervention.
Original languageEnglish
Article number3691
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume13
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fields of science

  • 302 Clinical Medicine
  • 303 Health Sciences
  • 304 Medical Biotechnology
  • 305 Other Human Medicine, Health Sciences
  • 302032 Cardiology
  • 302031 Intensive care medicine
  • 301 Medical-Theoretical Sciences, Pharmacy
  • 302030 Internal medicine

Cite this