Abstract
Purpose: To assess the mean absolute error (MAE) of classic and modern intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas to evaluate the feasibility of the ESCRS IOL Calculator.
Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Kepler University and Kepler University Clinic, Linz, Austria; Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Methods: 337 eyes of 337 patients who underwent implantation of a monofocal IOL (PCB00) were included in this study. The classic IOL calculation formulas output by the biometry device (Barrett Universal II [BUII], Haigis, SRK/T, and HofferQ) and modern formulas implemented in the ESCRS calculator (BUII, Cooke K6, EVO, Hill-RBF, Hoffer QST, Kane, and Pearl-DGS) were evaluated. The MAE, the number of eyes within ±0.5, ±1.0, ±1.5, ±2.0 diopters (D) of the target refraction, the agreement between ESCRS formulas on the proposed IOL power, and the time factor for the input in the ESCRS calculator were evaluated.
Results: The best performing ESCRS calculator formulas were Kane, EVO, and BUII with a MAE (SD) of 0.37 (0.30) D, 0.37 (0.32) D, and 0.38 (0.32) D. A lower, but not significant difference in MAE for ESCRS formulas compared with biometry formulas was observed. A significant difference was observed between Hoffer QST and all other formulas (P < .01 for all). After excluding Hoffer QST, testing revealed a significant difference between ESCRS and biometry formulas (P = .004).
Conclusions: The ESCRS calculator allows efficient and up-to-date IOL calculations in routine clinical practice. The predictive accuracy of the ESCRS calculator is superior compared with older biometric formulas.
Copyright © 2025 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.
Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Kepler University and Kepler University Clinic, Linz, Austria; Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Methods: 337 eyes of 337 patients who underwent implantation of a monofocal IOL (PCB00) were included in this study. The classic IOL calculation formulas output by the biometry device (Barrett Universal II [BUII], Haigis, SRK/T, and HofferQ) and modern formulas implemented in the ESCRS calculator (BUII, Cooke K6, EVO, Hill-RBF, Hoffer QST, Kane, and Pearl-DGS) were evaluated. The MAE, the number of eyes within ±0.5, ±1.0, ±1.5, ±2.0 diopters (D) of the target refraction, the agreement between ESCRS formulas on the proposed IOL power, and the time factor for the input in the ESCRS calculator were evaluated.
Results: The best performing ESCRS calculator formulas were Kane, EVO, and BUII with a MAE (SD) of 0.37 (0.30) D, 0.37 (0.32) D, and 0.38 (0.32) D. A lower, but not significant difference in MAE for ESCRS formulas compared with biometry formulas was observed. A significant difference was observed between Hoffer QST and all other formulas (P < .01 for all). After excluding Hoffer QST, testing revealed a significant difference between ESCRS and biometry formulas (P = .004).
Conclusions: The ESCRS calculator allows efficient and up-to-date IOL calculations in routine clinical practice. The predictive accuracy of the ESCRS calculator is superior compared with older biometric formulas.
Copyright © 2025 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 504-510 |
| Seitenumfang | 7 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery |
| Volume | 51 |
| Ausgabenummer | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 01 Juni 2025 |
Wissenschaftszweige
- 302007 Augenheilkunde
Dieses zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver